Review the answers:
Banning tattoos violates the Freedom of Speech:
Tattoos have become more accepted today:
Note that in the above paragraphs, Val uses statistics, data and primary sources to support her point. Even though the sources are neutral and do not actually express a point of view on Val's issue, Val can use the information as evidence in her argument.
Opposing argument: For tattoo bans:
The important point is that Val is able to use sources in her paper even if they support the opposing side. Explaining the other side gives the audience a more complete understanding of the issue. Since Val's paper is persuasive, she will use her other two main points to argue against this side.